|
NATO ON TRIAL INDEX PAGE
SUPPORTING NOTES
1 One-sided blame
Remarkably, in the same speech
that Robin Cook admitted the KLA were the instigators of most of
the violence he replayed the theme “We once again face a
humanitarian crisis as a result of the Serb repression in
Kosovo.”
2 Travesty of peace keeping in
Kosovo
We have now seen how NATO has set
up a military dictatorship in Kosovo with disastrous
consequences - a huge crime problem, a thousand murders in the
first six months - almost entirely Serb and other minority
victims - and the ethnic cleansing of 220,000 Serbs and other
minority ethnic groups. There is sham democracy in the form of
elections to consultative councils whilst all decision making is
done from above by NATO appointees.
We know that NATO troops were
ordered not to intervene to prevent the looting of Serbian
Orthodox Churches. “The orders are to let them pillage.” Preface
to Kosovo, War and Revenge, Tim Judah, Yale, 2000. NATO’s
total failure to prevent the Serb exodus would also appear to be
deliberate - a continued support for the KLA ethnic cleansers.
At best, it represents an appalling failure of their
peacekeeping role.
3 Purpose of Rambouillet talks to
create an excuse to bomb. No Yugoslav agreement was possible.
a. Dr Henry Kissinger (former US
Secretary of State and a Nobel Peace Prize Winner) said, "The
Rambouillet text, which called on Serbia to admit NATO troops
throughout Yugoslavia was a provocation, an excuse to start
bombing."
b. “The military annexe of the
Rambouillet proposals . . . would never have been acceptable to
the Yugoslav side, since it was a significant infringement of
its sovereignty.” - UK, Cross-party committee of MPs’ report, 24
October 2000, Lessons from Kosovo.
c. “I think certain people in
NATO were spoiling for a fight at that time. I think the terms
put to Milosevic at Rambouillet were absolutely intolerable: how
could he possibly accept them? It was quite deliberate.” - Lord
Gilbert, Defence Minister of State, responsible for
intelligence, 1999. Reported in The Guardian, 21 July
2000.
d. “If the Serbs would not agree
and the Albanians would agree then there was a very clear cause
for using force.” - Madeleine Albright in an interview with Alan
Little in BBC’s documentary, Moral Combat - NATO at War,
March 2000.
4 Contents of the Rambouillet
text kept from public scrutiny
Details of the Rambouillet text
did not appear in Britain till weeks after the bombing had
started.
The first reference to the demand
for NATO to occupy the whole of Yugoslavia, Appendix B, appeared
in the German newspaper, tageszeitung, on 6 April, 1999.
The text of the Rambouillet
Accord was not placed in the House of Commons library until
after 1 April 1999, long after the decision to bomb Yugoslavia
had been taken.
A similar situation occurred with
other NATO governments. Journalist, Stefan Reinecke commented in
tageszeitung, 13 April, “This appendix is a scandal. If
the Federal Government was not informed about this passage,
there is no hope. What is one to think about a government that
has not read the failed treaty - and so does not know the
details of why it is entering into a war. If the Federal
Government in fact was informed about this appendix, and
accepted its terms, it was a hair-raising political mistake.” -
p 160, Degraded Capability - The Media and the Kosovo Crisis,
edited by Philip Hammond and Edward S Herman, Pluto Press, 2000.
5 Serbs were not intransigent.
Serbs agreed basic principles and wished to continue the talks
A letter on or about 22 February
1999, sent by Ratko Markovic, the Serbian negotiator, asked for
a date on which to resume talks, and stated that the Yugoslav
Government had agreed to discuss "the scope and character" of an
"international presence" in Kosovo to "implement the agreement
to be accepted in Rambouillet". Another letter of 23 February
stated that the Serbian delegation looked forward to "continue
the work in line with the positive spirit of this meeting".
Quoted in Kosovo War And
Revenge by Tim Judah, Yale, 2000, p 218.
On 19 March the following
statement was issued,
“There were no talks in Paris. As a result, no agreement could
have been reached.
The text signed by some members of Kosmet
Albanians is not the Agreement of Rambouillet but the text
published before all the meetings.
The delegation of the Republic of
Serbia cannot be blamed for failure of the talks. By accepting
the ten principles established by the Contact Group, it
demonstrated its firm determination to achieve a political
agreement. The Federal Government urges that the initiated talks
be resumed and that all the participants in these talks apply
good will to bring the text of the political agreement, in all
its segments, in line with the Contact Group's ten principles. .
. A political agreement whereby representatives of the political
parties of Kosmet (Kosovo) Albanians will accept autonomy and
express respect for the territorial integrity and unity of the
Republic of Serbia will be the best proof that they have given
up the project of destroying the State whose full-fledged
citizens they are.” - Statement from the Federal Government of
Serbia's meeting, chaired by Prime Minister, Momir Bulatovic.
On 23 March 1999 the Serbian
National Assembly passed a resolution rejecting the NATO demand
for military occupation and calling on the OSCE and United
Nations to facilitate a peaceful diplomatic settlement. The
National Assembly resolution called for negotiations leading to
"the reaching of a political agreement on wide ranging autonomy
for Kosovo, with the securing of a full equality of all citizens
and ethnic communities and with respect for the sovereignty and
territorial integrity of the republic of Serbia and the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia. . . . The Serbian Parliament does not
accept the presence of foreign military troops in Kosovo. The
Serbian Parliament is ready to review the size and character of
the international presence in Kosmet [Kosovo] for carrying out
the reached accord, immediately upon signing the political
accord on the self-rule agreed and accepted by the
representatives of all national communities living in Kosovo."
Quoted by Noam Chomsky in The New Military Humanism - Lessons
from Kosovo, p 109, published by Pluto Press, 1999.
6 William Walker and the CIA
William Walker had been US
ambassador to El Salvador when the US was helping to suppress
leftwing rebels whilst supporting the contra guerillas against
the Sandanista government in Nicaragua. Many people believe he
is a member of the CIA.
The OSCE (Organisation for
Security and Co-operation in Europe) is a multinational,
unarmed, peace-keeping and observation organisation. Its
courageous members did much to keep the warring sides apart in
the winter of 98/99and to act as intermediaries negotiating the
return of kidnap victims.
The team known as KVM - the
Kosovo Verification Mission - had some 800 members. Part of
their duties was to monitor the Yugoslav compliance with the
force reduction agreement negotiated in October 1998. This gave
them effectively the role of spying on all military activity and
reporting in detail military hardware and activity throughout
the province.
The Sunday Times
of 12 March 2000 reported that the mission which was supposed to
be neutral had been infiltrated by officers of the CIA who were
there to give support to the KLA. The role of the OSCE was
therefore compromised and suspect. Since a dramatic media event
was required to justify NATO intervention it is possible that
the CIA had a hand in arranging the presentation of bodies at
Racak as a massacre.
7 Censorship of pathologist’s
report
Quoted by Richard Tyler, World
Socialist Web Site, 12 February, 2001. www.wsws.org
8 Serbs invited monitors
Edward S Herman and David
Peterson, p118, in Degraded Capability - The Media and the
Kosovo Crisis, edited by Philip Hammond and Edward S Herman,
Pluto Press, 2000.
9 Fear of assassination
Tim Judah, Kosovo, War and
Revenge, Yale, 2000, p 151
10 Talks called off
Tim Judah, Kosovo, War and
Revenge, Yale, 2000, p155.
11 KLA substantially non-Kosovan
“Nearly 40 per cent. of the KLA's
troops now come from outside Kosovo.” Mike Hancock MP
(Portsmouth, South) in Parliament, 16 February 1999.
12 KLA trained by US, UK and
Germany
a. "Kosovan Albanian extremists .
. . were trained, equipped, and armed by Washington in order to
counter the viciousness of Milosevic’s men." John Simpson,
Sunday Telegraph, 18 February 2001.
b. The Sunday Times on 12
March 2000 told how the CIA trained members of the KLA, and
infiltrated the Kosovo Verification Mission. When the mission
left Kosovo on 19 March 1999 they handed over to the KLA
satellite telephones and global positioning systems enabling KLA
commanders to stay in touch with General Wesley Clark, the NATO
commander.
c. There are numerous other
similar claims. The British SAS, according to the Daily
Telegraph, 22 February 2001, and 28 March 2001, also trained
the KLA. The Sunday Times, 18 March 2001, reported how
KLA men were “taught by British soldiers in the secretive
training camps that operated above Bajram Curri in northern
Albania during 1998 and 1999.”
d. The German support for the KLA
is mentioned in the film, Yugoslavia, the Avoidable War.
It was also mentioned in Germany in Monitor programmes by
ARD in autumn 1998.
e. The KLA possesses high
tech weapons which could only be put into operation with the
help of training by the supplying country or manufacturer. These
include ground to air missiles and anti-tank weapons like the
German Amburst and the Zola. The KLA also had “
Rocket-propelled grenades, and an American weapon which fires
highly explosive nitroglycerine." - The Guardian, 30 June
1999.
f. PBS Newshour reported
that U.S. Vietnam War veterans were training KLA mercenaries in
Albania. - July 15, 1998.
g. "MPRI sub-contracted some of
the training programme to two British private security
companies, ensuring that between 1998 and June 1999 the KLA was
being armed, trained and assisted in Italy, Turkey, Kosovo and
Germany by the Americans, the German external intelligence
service and former and serving members of Britain's 22 SAS
Regiment. " - Workers World Newspaper, 29 April 1999.
h. “The April 18 London Sunday
Telegraph reported that an SAS British special forces unit,
is running two KLA training camps near Tirana, the Albanian
capital.” - Workers World Newspaper, 29 April 1999.
13 82% Albanian
1991 census (the latest
available)
14 US backing terrorists
Alan Little, in an interview in
BBC’s Moral Combat - NATO at War, asked Madeleine
Albright what the punishment of the KLA would be if they failed
to behave in a reasonable way. Her reply, "The punishment would
be that they would lose completely the backing of the United
States and the contact group."
“Both U.S. Secretary of Defense
William Cohen and the top U.S. general, Henry Shelton, have said
in the last week that the goal of the U.S. military operation
against Yugoslavia is a victory for the KLA.” - Workers World
Newspaper, 29 April 1999.
15 NATO will punish
“NATO recalls that those
responsible for the massacre of Racak must be brought to
justice. . . NATO is ready to take whatever measures are
necessary. . . to avert a humanitarian catastrophe, by
compelling. . . the achievement of a political settlement. The
council has therefore agreed today that the NATO Secretary
General may authorise air strikes against targets on FRY
[Federal Republic of Yugoslavia] territory.” - Statement by the
North Atlantic Council [NATO] on Kosovo, Press Release, 30
January 1999.
16 The aim was to blame the Serbs
a. “All of the officials who have
worked on this have made very clear that in order to move
towards military action, it has to be clear that the Serbs were
responsible.” - James Rubin, US State Department spokesman,
press briefing at Rambouillet 21 February 1999, quoted in
Weller, The Crisis, page 469.
b. “I just didn’t have the nerve
to tell even a few sophisticated journalists that the only
failure at Rambouillet would be a rejection by the Albanians. .
. We had to gather European support for a credible threat of
airstrikes. For that, we needed an Albanian yes.” - James Rubin,
article in the Financial Times, 7 October 2000.
17 Bombing planned mid 1998
a. “NATO Defence Ministers
therefore decided in June 1998 to task NATO military planners to
produce a range of options, both ground and air . . . and by
early August the results had been reviewed by the North Atlantic
Council.” “During the summer, NATO forces conducted a series of
air and ground exercises to demonstrate the Alliance’s ability
to project power rapidly into the region.” - Kosovo, Lessons
From The Crisis P7, UK Ministry of Defence, 2000.
b. In August 1998 James Rubin, US
Assistant Secretary of State, explained that a number of
contingency plans were ready to be put into action in Kosovo so
a political decision to intervene could be made quickly. Troop
numbers needed and bombing targets throughout Serbia had already
been selected. In June 1998, NATO had staged mock air strikes in
neighbouring Albania and Macedonia. From August 17-22, air and
ground exercises were planned to take place in Albania and
during September in Macedonia. - State Department Daily Press
Briefing, 3 August 1998.
18 The document that could never
be signed
The Americans planned to make the
Rambouillet document unsignable by the Yugoslavs. This has been
explicitly explained by James Rubin, Madeleine Albright’s right
hand man and the US State Department spokesman who took part in
the talks at Rambouillet. In a Financial Times article published
on 7 October 2000 he said, "Albright had given the Serbs a take
it or leave it proposal they could never accept." The proposal
was the non-negotiable demand that NATO forces be allowed to
occupy the whole of Yugoslavia without restriction or time
limit. It was introduced into the document a matter of hours
before the scheduled end for the talks at Rambouillet in
February.
19 Serb forces increase in
February and March 1999
“Following the talks in
Rambouillet, France (6-23 February 1999), there was a
significant build up of VJ [Serb army] forces throughout Kosovo,
leading to the arming of civilians and the training of
reservists, the arrival of anti-aircraft weapons, the digging of
tank pits and the preparation of demolition explosives along key
routes in from the south and an increase in military air
activity.”
“By March 1999, the Yugoslav
military/security forces were coping with two tasks: defeating
the UCK [KLA] and preparing for an attack by NATO. The effect
was to require the border areas to be secured, as seen with the
VJ building up positions south of Gnjilane/Gjilan and entering
villages in what otherwise had been described as a "quiet
district". However, more resources and attention went to the
west of Kosovo and the border with Albania. Here existed not
only a possible route for NATO to enter, but an area where the
UCK was particularly active, with "safe havens" and supplies in
Albania.” - OSCE Report, KOSOVO /
KOSOVA As Seen, As Told.
Javier Solana noted in his letter
to Kofi Annan, 23 March 1999, “On 18 March, KVM observers sight
an air defence radar at Prizren airfield normally associated
with surface to air missiles. This represents a violation of the
air verification agreement.” How wrong of the Serbs. What could
the motive possibly have been? Under the UN Charter air defence
radar qualified as legitimate self-defence. NATO’s threatened
bombing was illegal under the UN Charter.
20 Serb policing
The Serbs were often accused of
using excessive force. The following may be a fairly typical
example of an attempt to arrest KLA fighters. The OSCE report to
the United Nations for the period mid January to mid February
1999 described an incident which was observed by the KVM
monitors. “The police surrounded two houses and called for the
occupants to surrender. The residents replied with small arms
fire. Further negotiations brokered by the KVM failed when the
occupants of the house opened fire with an anti-tank rocket
launcher. The police responded with anti-aircraft artillery
fire. The bodies of two armed KLA members were found. It was
estimated that 10 other occupants had escaped.” Out of context
the mention of the use of anti-aircraft artillery fire to effect
an arrest sounds appalling, but what is the correct level of
force the use against an anti-tank rocket launcher?
21 Signals that the war was for
real
The Times,
20 February 1999.
22 Belgrade bracing for war with
NATO
The Guardian,
18 March 1999
23 Serb action started 20 March
“We got out in record time.
Milosevic and his troops were anxious for us to leave so that
they could start. The campaign kicked off immediately.” William
Walker, interview with Alan Little, BBC film, Moral Combat,
NATO at War, March 2000.
24 Bomb threat if Rambouillet
text not signed
Reported by Veton Surroi, Kosovo
Albanian negotiator. Alan Little interview, BBC film, Moral
Combat, NATO at War, March 2000
25 Estimates of people fleeing in
first few days of Serb attacks against KLA
Statistics for numbers of
displaced persons within Kosovo were often only guesses made by
the KLA who had a vested interest in exaggeration. Their figures
were passed to refugee agencies who had almost no means of
checking the estimates and who also had a vested interest in
exaggeration. These estimates were then passed on to the media
and politicians as facts. The Guardian, 20 March,
“According to Ferdinando Del Mundo, the head of the United
Nations refugee agency (UNHCR) in Kosovo, at least 20,000 ethnic
Albanians have abandoned their villages in the last four days as
Serbian army and police units roll back Albanian fighters.”
The Sunday Times
of 21 March reported, “The worst violence was northwest of
Pristina, the provincial capital. As Serbian forces advanced
against a stronghold of the Kosovo Liberation Army in the
Drenica region, columns of refugees stretched for miles. . . The
United Nations refugee agency estimates that 20,000 people have
been displaced in the past seven days.”
26 James Rubin predicts bombing
will prevent a refugee problem
Quoted by Philip Hammond p126 in
Degraded Capability - The Media and the Kosovo Crisis,
edited by Philip Hammond and Edward S Herman, Pluto Press, 2000.
27 KLA ordered refugees to leave.
NATO another cause of the refugee crisis
Jonathan Steele reported in
The Guardian, 30 June 1999, how a KLA fighter had told him
that the KLA had instructed many people to leave their homes.
“Many left because they were
driven out, but an equal number left to escape the NATO
bombardment and some left because of the fighting between the
KLA and the Yugoslav Army.” - Paul Watson of the Los Angeles
Times, quoted by Eve-Anne Prentice in One Woman’s War
published by Duckworth, 2000. Paul Watson was in Kosovo
throughout the NATO bombing.
“The KLA . . . wanted every
Albanian to join the exodus which was mesmerising the world.” -
Eve-Anne Prentice in One Woman’s War. Eve-Anne Prentice
was in Kosovo during the bombing and carried out many interviews
there.
“This was the KLA's national
plan. All loyal Albanians were to leave during the bombing and
go to Albania or Macedonia to show the world how terrible the
Serbs were; this exodus was staged; it was a performance,
Hollywood in Kosovo. . . The KLA and NATO were telling
Albanians: NATO supports the KLA. After NATO takes over, the KLA
will be in charge and if you don't leave now you will be in big
trouble later. There will be no safe refuge.” - Cedda
Pralinchevich, Kosovan historian in an interview with Jared
Israel.
www.tenc.net
28 Yugoslavs flee into Hungary in
fear of NATO bombs
Rezso Banyasz, former Hungarian
Ambassador in London, Chairman of the Foundation for a Neutral
Hungary, in After The War In Yugoslavia: New Dangers For
Hungary and Europe - The Spokesman, no 67, 2000,
published by the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation.
29 Refugee cumulative statistics
relate to 1998 plus three months of 1999
The statistics quoted by Tony
Blair were historical figures and did not take into account the
numbers of returned people. - See note 30.
a. “When the UN humanitarian
organizations and their NGO partners had to suspend operations
in Kosovo on 23 March 1999, there were thought to be over
260,000 persons displaced within Kosovo, over 100,000 elsewhere
in the region, and over 100,000 others who had sought asylum
outside the region since early 1998.” [emphasis
added] - . Fourth Special Report by the United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees to House of Commons’ International
Development Committee, Appendix 2, 30 June 1999.
The same figures were quoted in
the UN press briefing by by Manoel de Almeida e Silva, Deputy
Spokesman for the UN Secretary-General on 25 March. “For the
record, according to UNHCR, since the beginning of the
conflict in Kosovo a year ago, some 450,000
people have been displaced by fighting -- more than 260,000 of
them in Kosovo; 25,000 in Montenegro; 30,000 in Serbia; 16,000
in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia; 10,000 in
Bosnia; 18,500 in Albania and some 100,000 in different
countries in Europe.” [emphasis added]
30 Refugees within Kosovo had
returned home at the end of 1998
“In last year's fighting between
the Serbs and the Kosovo Liberation Army, 250,000 ethnic
Albanian refugees fled their homes, and hid in the hillsides.
None of the refugees are up there any longer.” - BBC News
(http://news.bbc.co.uk). 12 Jan 99.
31 KLA leader boasted of
extending KLA territory when Serbs withdrew forces
Alan Little interview with Agim
Ceku, BBC film, Moral Combat, NATO at War, March 2000
32 KLA boasts of preparing spring
offensive in absence of Serb forces
Quoted by Tim Judah p 189,
Kosovo, War and Revenge, Tim Judah, Yale, 2000.
33 Russian outrage
From the pamphlet. A Russian
Voice On The War, Roy A Medvedev, published April 1999 by
Spokesman, for the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation,
Nottingham.
34 Indian commentators
Quotations from Degraded
Capability - The Media and the Kosovo Crisis, edited by
Philip Hammond and Edward S Herman, Pluto Press, 2000.
35 Russia, China, India alliance
and arms increase
Information from William Ratliff,
Senior Research Fellow and Curator of the Americas,
International, and Peace Collections at the Hoover Institution
in Harvard International Review, Vol. 22 Issue 4, 2001.
36 International progress
reversed
Quoted in The Spokesman,
no 65, 1999, published by the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation.
37 Sources: Yugoslavia for sale
The Times,
15 August 2000; Ulrich Rippert, 10 July 1999, World Socialist
Web Site
Chris Marsden, World Socialist
Web Site, 16 August, 2000, www.wsws.org; “Notices of Tender”
UNMIK web site; Michel Chossudovsky, Professor of Economics,
Ottawa, February 2000;
www.tenc.net;
the web site of the International Finance Corporation,
www.ifc.org;
BBC News 7 May 2001.
38 Sources Serb/Albanian
relationship
Main sources of facts: Tim Judah,
Kosovo, War and Revenge, Yale, 2000, Kosovo - How
Myths and Truths Started a War, Julie Mertus, University of
California Press,1999, Following Washington’s Script: the
United States Media and Kosovo, Seth Ackerman and Jim
Naureckas in Degraded Capability - The media and the Kosovo
Crisis, edited by Philip Hammond and Edward Herman,
published by Pluto, 2000; US National Vital Statistics
Report. 2000; 48(11))
39 Non-Western media saw things
differently
a “The Indian press disagreed
with the Western perspective and performance during the Yugoslav
crisis, as did much of the rest of the world that encompassed
Russia, China, the Orthodox Christian countries, most of Latin
America harbouring long memories of American imperialism and
military and intervention over the last century, and Africa with
its memories of white colonial oppression. But the American and
Western media and their governments continued to languish in the
bliss that the United States is the sole superpower with a
monopoly on wisdom and morality, that NATO is the protector of
the world, and the West is the ‘international community’.” -
Raju C Thomas in How India Sees Through Western Reports,
in Degraded Capability - The Media and the Kosovo Crisis,
edited by Philip Hammond and Edward S Herman, Pluto Press, 2000.
b “Watching the likes of
Christiane Amanpour and her BBC counterparts, one is reminded of
Stalin’s USSR, when lies were first believed thoroughly and then
uttered. To these ‘unbiassed’ commentators, there is no
connection between the NATO bombing and the refugee floods.
There is no harm in killing Serbian media persons, or in bombing
away at a country in a manner reminiscent of Hitler’s war
against Republican Spain in the 1930s.” - M D Nalapat, Senior
Editor, in Times of India, 4 May 1999
40 A British View of American
Motives in Kosovo
“How have you swallowed the
CIA-funded propaganda that demonises the Serbs? Are you not
familiar with the duplicity and intimidation of the United
States foreign policy? That Ambassador Walker, in charge of
monitoring forces in Kosovo was financing the contras? Have you
no recall of that ‘Free World’ crap that embraced Batista,
Noriega, Syngman Rhee, Bao Dai, Lee Van Thieu and Sukarno?” -
The late Alan Clarke, Conservative MP, former Minister of
Defence, 27 March 1999, House of Commons.
41 Letter to Albanian friends
From The Balkans, Nationalism
and Imperialism, edited by Lindsey German. Published by
Bookmarks, 1999.
42 Cook looks forward to more
humanitarian interventions
“Robin Cook, the Foreign
Secretary last night defended his controversial ‘ethical foreign
policy’ and pledged that a future Labour Government would be
even more committed to humanitarian intervention abroad than it
had been during four years in office.” Cook wants to build “a
global Britain” over the next four years. Report by Richard
Beeston, The Times, 26 April 2001.
NATO ON TRIAL INDEX PAGE
NEXT PAGE |